Rationing the Blame: Is it users of SEO programs or is it Google?
I confess. Before hearing about SEO software and website marketing trade, I considered that Google was perfect. I Used Google to look for everything from friends, to pictures, to news stories to obscure things and unquestionably trusted the search outcomes. Then I learned about SEO tools and an emerging e-commerce specializing in site optimization, and things were never the same. But even before my revelation, having done some reflective musings, I got a feeling that search engines, Google to boot, know far from all, and share with the web community a tiny portion of what they know.
My search escapades soon convinced me that Flikr is a more comprehensive image data bank, that with the help of Digg I can get interesting news coverage without the need to rummage through Google search retrieval (rummaging seems more appropriate than Google search), and human search is better managed by Facebook. It seems like whenever I search for obscure objects on Google, the results are almost always inaccurate, to put it kindly. Try searching for SEO products and other SEO relevant subjects on Google and you are just about prepared to lose your patience. I mean, tell me, what’s the connection between SEO applications and employment websites or Internet casinos? It happens in my disappointment.
So when news of best seo tools software and the entire field built around it invaded my humble worldview, my suspicions about webpages coming up on P1 of Google increased virally. Do they merit to be there and who is to blame, Google or webmasters using SEO programs. The moral quandary is vast. Do I seize using my SEO google rank checker or do I stop using Google instead? I concluded that I can’t boycott Google just yet. At least not till the decent competitor enters the picture. For now I will keep juggling between Blekko, Google and the above methods to complement the SERP mess that Google is. And, oh,yes, I will keep playing with my SEO applications.
To be honest, SEO applications is the reason why guys like myself get some visibility on the net. smart as they are, search engine web indexers are not likely to find some no-name guy and rank his webpage highly. In this respect, I still am a strong believer in SEO products and natural search. If it was all about the money, the corporate entities would destroy me before I knew it. And there are hundreds of powerbrands on the Fortune list! But here is something else that annoys me and other check backlinks users, I am certain. There are guys who buy SEO products and use them to sell shoeson career sites and such. What we are given is rubbish that not only takes over the web but is also well valued by search engines.
What is the user perspective on this? They search for SEO app reviews and will instead find junk content. They get disillusioned. So much for the “Internet democracy”. Does this mean that SEO product and service field is bad? Probably not.
The unethical users of SEO programs have to stop bastardizing the Internet but it’s like ordering hackers to stop cracking the code. The unfortunate thing about it is that black hat SEOs are abusing the prospect to be visible on the Net that is available to the no-name dude like me. For now people just have to live with them. We can only wish that Google will put more emphasis on finding the schemers abusing SEO applications, and if Google doesn’t, the big search engine will.
Tags: google, Optimization, SEO, software. tools, tool